Self-Funding vs. Level-Funding: What to Know
Raymond Collins

Exploring employee health benefits can be daunting, especially for employers striving to balance cost-effectiveness with quality. Understanding the distinction between self-funded and level-funded health plans is crucial in making an informed decision that aligns with your business needs. Let's delve into how these two funding models differ and how each can serve your company by balancing flexibility, risk tolerance, and cost predictability.

Self-Funded Plans

A self-funded health plan, also known as self-insurance, places the financial responsibility for claims with the employer. In essence, this means your company pays for each employee's medical claims as they arise, offering you full control over both the plan design and the selection of vendors. This flexibility can be advantageous, allowing you to tailor healthcare benefits to your workforce's specific needs.

However, the unpredictability of costs is a significant factor to consider. High-cost claims can potentially disrupt your budget, making stop-loss insurance an essential tool in mitigating this financial risk. Additionally, regulatory oversight for self-funded plans falls under federal law (ERISA), rather than state insurance regulations, offering a different compliance landscape to navigate.

Level-Funded Plans

Level-funded plans offer a more predictable cost structure, combining the aspects of self-funding with traditional insurance. These plans feature a fixed monthly payment that encompasses claims estimates, administrative fees, and stop-loss coverage. This bundled payment approach aids in financial planning and budget consistency.

Financially, level-funded plans provide protections against claim overages with a defined cap. If actual claims come in under budget, your business might even benefit from refunds or credits, making this model appealing from both a risk and a fiscal perspective.

Key Differences

When comparing the two, the primary distinction lies in risk and control. Self-funded plans place full financial risk on the employer, whereas level-funded plans cap that risk, thus simplifying budgeting with consistent monthly payments.

In terms of savings potential, self-funded plans may yield higher long-term savings if claims remain low, while level-funded plans might offer partial refunds under similar conditions. Additionally, while self-funded plans allow maximum customization, level-funded plans strike a balance between customization and third-party support, efficiently managing the complexity for you.

When deciding, consider your company’s size and financial stability. Larger or more financially robust companies might benefit from the potential savings and flexibility of self-funding. Conversely, smaller or midsize businesses may prefer the predictability and straightforward budgeting that level-funding offers.

Before making a choice, assess your company’s financial stability, risk tolerance, and desired level of plan control. Remember, both self-funding and level-funding present advantageous alternatives to traditional insurance, depending on your unique business needs.

For guidance tailored to your business, consider consulting an expert who can help you navigate the complexities and choose the best-fit option for providing health coverage to your employees.